menu
Vettori not expecting 'belters' everywhere, urges SRH to adapt

18 Apr, 2025 1:42 PM, Fri

Vettori not expecting 'belters' everywhere, urges SRH to adapt

There is a stat that Sunrisers Hyderabad would be itching to correct. They are the only team out of all of the teams participating in this season that has not yet won at home. They were outplayed by Mumbai Indians in their latest away game on April 17 at the Wankhede Stadium, which also didn't go as planned. It is not just the results that would worry the SRH camp but a clear pattern that has started to emerge from the defeats. Both of SRH's wins came at home, on extremely batting friendly surfaces, where they registered scores of 286 batting first and a successful chase of 246. However, in the other two games they played at home, they played to deceive, scoring 191 on a surface where 220 was equal and only 153 on the toughest surface. Away from home, the struggles have magnified. SRH are yet to breach the 170-run mark in matches outside Hyderabad this season. While there continues to be a debate over how much home advantage teams need to be given in the IPL, SRH have encountered trickier surfaces in their away games, whether those were by design or coincidence. Head coach Daniel Vettori is aware of his team's trends but didn't seem overly concerned about it. At the press conference following the race, Vettori stated, "I feel like no-one really has control over their surface." Therefore, when it comes to encountering wickets that don't suit us, there is a little bit of luck involved. But I think there has to be more to it from our side that we have to adapt." SRH's extremely aggressive openers struggled to get going quickly on a Wankhede pitch that played slower than usual. However, they did well to get through the PowerPlay without being separated, although that was largely due to MI's sloppy catching. Nevertheless, considering the SRH camp's firepower, 46/0 didn't appear to be too bad. However, apart from two final overs when Heinrich Klaasen and Aniket Verma were able to cash in, the innings never gained any momentum. Such was the efficiency of Mumbai Indians' bowling unit that three of SRH's top-four couldn't go at run-a-ball. Travis Head hung around for 29 deliveries for his 28, his slowest T20 innings where he has faced 20-plus deliveries. Even the usually dominant Klaasen had to bide his time and his strike-rate of 132 is inflated by the one big over at the back end. None of SRH's batters were able to quickly adjust to the surface's characteristics. The advent of dew, that came late in the SRH innings, then ensured a largely smooth chase for MI. We are aware of similar circumstances in Chennai and occasionally Ahmedabad. So we're not expecting to go over around the country and come up on belters. So the ball's in our court to realise that. Additionally, I believe we performed fairly well today. Through the middle stages, it was just extremely difficult. And I've credited Mumbai, how well they bowled throughout that innings. "In general it was a difficult batting surface, and 180 maybe would have been a par score and something that could have challenged Mumbai, but I think the way that they navigated the middle period, particularly their six-hitting prowess, took the game away from us." Change of pace was the key ingredient in the menu for MI's bowlers and they utilised it brilliantly. Of the 30 deliveries that were bowled by pacers with pace-off, only 36 runs were scored. They managed only a solitary breakthrough via this method but the pressure created with these deliveries paid off through other avenues. In contrast, SRH's pacers did manage three wickets off slower balls from 33 deliveries but it came at a cost of 60 runs. The difference in lengths was alarming, although dew also had a say in this. "I think Mumbai read the conditions exceptionally well, and after probably the first few overs, they really relied on that slower ball, and I think the slower ball was obviously effective, but it was mainly effective because of their execution, and there's some supreme exponents of it in Bumrah and Trent Boult and even Hardik Pandya. "I think we finished pretty well, but just that middle stage, the way that they bowled, didn't allow us to score.I thought we tried to counter it pretty well. I think we worked out how difficult it was trying to get through it, but credit to them the way that they bowled."

Trending Series

cricket mazza ads

Team Rankings

Rank Team Rating Points
1 India 122 5117
2 Australia 116 3936
3 South Africa 112 3357
4 Pakistan 106 2762
5 New Zealand 101 3349
Rank Player Name Points
1 Babar Azam 824
2 Shubman Gill 801
3 V. Kohli 768
4 H.T. Tector 746
5 R.G. Sharma 746
Rank Player Name Points
1 K.A. Maharaj 716
2 J.R. Hazlewood 688
3 A. Zampa 686
4 Mohammed Siraj 678
5 J.J. Bumrah 665
Rank Player Name Points
1 Mohammad Nabi 320
2 Shakib Al Hasan 292
3 Sikandar Raza 288
4 A. Vala 248
5 Rashid Khan 239
Rank Team Rating Points
1 Australia 124 3715
2 India 120 3108
3 England 105 3151
4 South Africa 103 1845
5 New Zealand 96 2121
Rank Player Name Points
1 K.S. Williamson 859
2 J.E. Root 824
3 D.J. Mitchell 768
4 Babar Azam 768
5 S.P.D. Smith 757
Rank Player Name Points
1 R. Ashwin 870
2 J.J. Bumrah 847
3 J.R. Hazlewood 847
4 K. Rabada 834
5 P.J. Cummins 820
Rank Player Name Points
1 R.A. Jadeja 444
2 R. Ashwin 322
3 Shakib Al Hasan 310
4 J.E. Root 282
5 J.O. Holder 270
Rank Team Rating Points
1 India 266 14108
2 Australia 256 10241
3 England 254 9660
4 West Indies 252 11604
5 South Africa 251 8287
Rank Player Name Points
1 T.M. Head 844
2 S.A. Yadav 842
3 P.D. Salt 816
4 Babar Azam 755
5 Mohammad Rizwan 746
Rank Player Name Points
1 A.U. Rashid 719
2 Rashid Khan 681
3 P.W.H. De Silva 674
4 J.R. Hazlewood 662
5 A.J. Hosein 659
Rank Player Name Points
1 P.W.H. De Silva 222
2 Mohammad Nabi 214
3 H.H. Pandya 213
4 M.P. Stoinis 211
5 Sikandar Raza 210
cricket mazza ads
cricket mazza ads

Featured Videos


ads footer

© 2024 Cricket Mazza. All Rights Reserved